Six modes of co-production for sustainability
Loading...
Date
Authors
Wyborn, Carina
Cvitanovic, Christopher
Munera-Roldan, Claudia
Chambers, J
Ryan, Melanie
Reid, Robin
Riechers, Maria
Serban, Anca
Bennett, Nathan J.
Maria E., Fernandez-Gimenez
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Nature
Abstract
The promise of co-production to address complex sustainability challenges is compelling. Yet, co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice, encompasses diverse aims, terminologies and practices, with poor clarity over their implications. To explore this diversity, we systematically mapped differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales. We found variation in their purpose for utilizing co-production, understanding of power, approach to politics and pathways to impact. A cluster analysis identified six modes of co-production: (1) researching solutions; (2) empowering voices; (3) brokering power; (4) reframing power; (5) navigating differences and (6) reframing agency. No mode is ideal; each holds unique potential to achieve particular outcomes, but also poses unique challenges and risks. Our analysis provides a heuristic tool for researchers and societal actors to critically explore this diversity and effectively navigate trade-offs when co-producing sustainability.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Nature Sustainability
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description