Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Hansen, Nicole
Sato, Chloe F.
Driscoll, Don
Lindenmayer, David B.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

British Ecological Society

Abstract

1. Preventing biodiversity loss in fragmented agricultural landscapes is a global problem. The persistence of biodiversity within remnant vegetation can be influenced by an animal’s ability to move through the farmland matrix between habitat patches. Yet, many of the mechanisms driving species occurrence within these landscapes are poorly understood, particularly for reptiles. 2. We used scented and unscented plasticine lizard models and wildlife cameras to (1) estimate predation risk of reptiles in four farmland types (crop field, pasture paddock, restoration tree planting and areas with applied woody mulch) relative to the patch edge and remnant vegetation, and (2) examine how predation risk was influenced by temporal change in the matrix (crop harvesting). 3. Birds (55.1%), mammals (41.1%), reptiles (3.4%) and invertebrates (0.5%) attacked models, of which 87% were native species. Mammalian predators were 60.2% more likely to attack scented models then unscented models. Bird predators were not influenced by scent. 4. We found predator attacks on models were highest at edges (49%, irrespective of adjacent farmland type, with a reduced risk within farmland (29%) and remnant patches (33%) (P<0.01). Both mammal and bird predators contributed to high numbers of predation attempts at edges. 5. Removal of crops did not increase predation attempts in crop fields or other farmland types, although predation attempts were significantly lower along the crop transect after harvesting, compared to the woody debris transect. However, numbers of predation attempts were higher in edge habitats, particularly prior to harvesting. 6. Synthesis and applications. Reptiles are at risk of predation by birds and mammals in both remnant patches and the farmland matrix, particularly in edge habitat. Our results demonstrate that edge habitats are potentially riskier for lizards than the farmland. Vulnerability to predation may be increased by a lack of shelter within edge habitats such as by increasing visibility of reptiles to predators. Therefore, to benefit reptiles, land managers could provide shelter (rocks, logs and grasses), particularly between remnants and linear plantings which could improve landscape connectivity.

Description

Citation

Hansen, N.A., Sato, C.F., Michael, D.R., Lindenmayer, D.B. and Driscoll, D.A. (2018). Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13269

Source

Journal of Applied Ecology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd