Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Technology assessment in Australia: the case for a formal agency to improve advice to policy makers

dc.contributor.authorRussell, Alice
dc.contributor.authorVanclay, Francis Martin
dc.contributor.authorSalisbury, Janet G
dc.contributor.authorAslin, Heather J
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:30:07Z
dc.description.abstractThe pace and reach of technological change has led to calls for better technology policy and governance to improve social outcomes. Technology assessment can provide information and processes to improve technology policy. Having conducted a review of international best practice, we established a set of quality criteria for TA. In effect, good technology assessments are systematic, broad, inclusive and well resourced and are conducted by organisations that are trustworthy and influential. Although not having a formal TA agency, Australia does have a number of recent examples of TA-like activities in the form of ad hoc processes (such as reviews and inquiries) and within other organisations. Drawing on reports, commentaries, discussions and our observations as participants, we have assessed these activities and processes against our quality criteria. Our findings indicate that TA capacity in Australia is fragmented, uncoordinated and variable in quality and impact. We conclude that a formal TA agency could improve Australian technology policy and capacity for technology governance that would be more in line with other nations, notably in Europe.
dc.identifier.issn0032-2687
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/60012
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.sourcePolicy Sciences
dc.subjectKeywords: policy making; technological change; technology policy; Australia Consensus conference; Office of technology assessment; Participatory TA; Social aspects of technology; Technological change; Technology governance; Technology policy
dc.titleTechnology assessment in Australia: the case for a formal agency to improve advice to policy makers
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issueOnline 30 July 2010
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage21
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationRussell, Alice, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationVanclay, Francis Martin, University of Tasmania
local.contributor.affiliationSalisbury, Janet G, Biotext
local.contributor.affiliationAslin, Heather J, Charles Darwin University
local.contributor.authoruidRussell, Alice, u4699536
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor109999 - Technology not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB518
local.identifier.citationvolume2010
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s11077-010-9120-4
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-79956111454
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Russell_Technology_assessment_in_2010.pdf
Size:
247.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format