The language of possession: Three case studies

dc.contributor.author	Keen, Ian
dc.date.accessioned	2015-12-13T22:22:48Z
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.date.updated	2015-12-11T07:59:03Z
dc.description.abstract	Anthropologists often construe property in terms of rights, obligations, and interests, or use property in a largely undefined way. The use of the language of rights as a metalanguage is questionable for it is culturally specific, having developed in the
dc.identifier.issn	0047-4045
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1885/72436
dc.publisher	Cambridge University Press
dc.source	Language in Society
dc.title	The language of possession: Three case studies
dc.type	Journal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue	2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage	214
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage	187
local.contributor.affiliation	Keen, Ian, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoruid	Keen, Ian, u8800144
local.description.embargo	2037-12-31
local.description.notes	Imported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor	160103 - Linguistic Anthropology
local.identifier.absseo	970120 - Expanding Knowledge in Languages, Communication and Culture
local.identifier.ariespublication	f5625xPUB3244
local.identifier.citationvolume	42
local.identifier.doi	10.1017/S0047404513000043
local.identifier.scopusID	2-s2.0-84875948360
local.type.status	Published Version

Downloads

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1