Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Constraining Plateau Uplift in Southern Africa by Combining Thermochronology, Sediment Flux, Topography, and Landscape Evolution Modeling

dc.contributor.authorStanley, Jessica R
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Jean
dc.contributor.authorBaby, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorGuillocheau, Francois
dc.contributor.authorRobin, Cecile
dc.contributor.authorFlowers, R M
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Roderick
dc.contributor.authorWildman, Mark
dc.contributor.authorBeucher, Romain
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T00:47:41Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T00:47:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-04-03T08:18:37Z
dc.description.abstractThe uplift of the southern African Plateau with its average elevations of similar to 1,000 m is often attributed to mantle processes, but there are conflicting theories for the timing and drivers of topographic development. Evidence for most proposed plateau development histories is derived from continental erosion histories, marine stratigraphic architecture, or landscape morphology. Here we use a landscape evolution model to integrate a large data set of low-temperature thermochronometry, sediment flux rates to surrounding marine basins, and current topography for southern Africa. We explore three main hypotheses for surface uplift: (a) southern Africa was already elevated by the Early Cretaceous before Gondwana breakup, (b) uplift and continental tilting occurred during the mid-Cretaceous, or (c) uplift occurred during the mid to late Cenozoic. We test which of these three intervals of plateau development are plausible by using an inversion method to constrain the range in erosional and uplift model parameters that can best reproduce the observed data. Results indicate four regions of parameter space that fall into two families of uplift histories are most compatible with the data. Both uplift families have limited initial topography with some topographic uplift and continental tilting starting at similar to 90-100 Ma. In one acceptable scenario, nearly all of the topography, >1,300 m, is created at this time with little Cenozoic uplift. In the other acceptable scenario, similar to 400-800 m of uplift occurs in the mid-Cretaceous with another similar to 500-1,000 m of uplift in the mid-Cenozoic. The two model scenarios have different geodynamic implications, which we compare to geodynamic models.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport for this project was provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2169-9313en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/293525
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposesen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.rights© 2021. The Authors.en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthen_AU
dc.titleConstraining Plateau Uplift in Southern Africa by Combining Thermochronology, Sediment Flux, Topography, and Landscape Evolution Modelingen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue7en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage34en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationStanley, Jessica R, University of Idahoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBraun, Jean, Helmholtz Centre Potsdamen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBaby, Guillaume, Universite de Parisen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGuillocheau, Francois, Universite de Rennesen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRobin, Cecile, Universite de Rennesen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFlowers, R M, University of Coloradoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBrown, Roderick, University of Glasgowen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWildman, Mark, University of Glasgowen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBeucher, Romain, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBeucher, Romain, u1090657en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor370502 - Geochronologyen_AU
local.identifier.absfor370511 - Structural geology and tectonicsen_AU
local.identifier.absfor370604 - Geodynamicsen_AU
local.identifier.absseo250399 - Mineral exploration not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo170299 - Energy exploration not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB21198en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume126en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1029/2020JB021243en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonID000678880700050
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.wiley.com/en-gben_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JGR Solid Earth - 2021 - Stanley - Constraining Plateau Uplift in Southern Africa by Combining Thermochronology Sediment.pdf
Size:
11.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: