The Transfer-Pricing Profit-Split Method After BEPS: Back to the Future
| dc.contributor.author | Kobetsky, Michael | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-28T04:31:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-28T04:31:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2023-12-10T07:17:08Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | In 2018, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Group of Twenty(OECD/G20) Inclusive Framework on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS): action 10 Issued revised guidance on the transactional profit-split method. Regrettably, the revised guidance failed to provide the opportunity for the profit-split method to be more often the most appropriate transfer-pricing method. The revised guidance expressly states that the lack of comparable uncontrolled transactions, by itself, is not a basis for the use of the profit-split method. Under the former guidance, the profit-split method was used infrequently. In the revised guidance, the threshold requirements for the use of the profit-split method are still restrictive. Consequently, it is likely that the profit-split method will rarely be the most appropriate transfer-pricing method. Nevertheless, the residual profit-split method is being considered for BEPS action 1, on the taxation of the digital economy. Two of the proposals under pillar 1 of the Inclusive Framework’s 2019 short policy note involve the use of the residual profit-split method to allocate profits. These proposals involve new profit allocation rules that go beyond the arm’s-length principle | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0008-5111 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1885/733748689 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_AU | en_AU |
| dc.publisher | Canadian Tax Foundation | |
| dc.rights | ©2019 The authors | |
| dc.source | Canadian Tax Journal | |
| dc.subject | ARM’S LENGTH | |
| dc.subject | BEPS | |
| dc.subject | OECD | |
| dc.subject | PROFIT-SPLIT | |
| dc.subject | TRANSFER PRICING | |
| dc.title | The Transfer-Pricing Profit-Split Method After BEPS: Back to the Future | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 4 | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 1105 | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 1077 | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Kobetsky, Michael, ANU College of Law, ANU | |
| local.contributor.authoruid | Kobetsky, Michael, u9009616 | |
| local.description.embargo | 2099-12-31 | |
| local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
| local.identifier.absfor | 480106 - Taxation law | |
| local.identifier.ariespublication | u4455135xPUB634 | |
| local.identifier.citationvolume | 67 | |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.32721/ctj.2019.67.4.sym.kobetsky | |
| local.publisher.url | https://www.ctf.ca/ | |
| local.type.status | Published Version | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 67 |
Downloads
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 1077_2019CTJ4-Sym-Kobetsky.pdf
- Size:
- 275 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format