Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Transfer-Pricing Profit-Split Method After BEPS: Back to the Future

dc.contributor.authorKobetsky, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-28T04:31:17Z
dc.date.available2025-04-28T04:31:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2023-12-10T07:17:08Z
dc.description.abstractIn 2018, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Group of Twenty(OECD/G20) Inclusive Framework on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS): action 10 Issued revised guidance on the transactional profit-split method. Regrettably, the revised guidance failed to provide the opportunity for the profit-split method to be more often the most appropriate transfer-pricing method. The revised guidance expressly states that the lack of comparable uncontrolled transactions, by itself, is not a basis for the use of the profit-split method. Under the former guidance, the profit-split method was used infrequently. In the revised guidance, the threshold requirements for the use of the profit-split method are still restrictive. Consequently, it is likely that the profit-split method will rarely be the most appropriate transfer-pricing method. Nevertheless, the residual profit-split method is being considered for BEPS action 1, on the taxation of the digital economy. Two of the proposals under pillar 1 of the Inclusive Framework’s 2019 short policy note involve the use of the residual profit-split method to allocate profits. These proposals involve new profit allocation rules that go beyond the arm’s-length principle
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0008-5111
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733748689
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherCanadian Tax Foundation
dc.rights©2019 The authors
dc.sourceCanadian Tax Journal
dc.subjectARM’S LENGTH
dc.subjectBEPS
dc.subjectOECD
dc.subjectPROFIT-SPLIT
dc.subjectTRANSFER PRICING
dc.titleThe Transfer-Pricing Profit-Split Method After BEPS: Back to the Future
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1105
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1077
local.contributor.affiliationKobetsky, Michael, ANU College of Law, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidKobetsky, Michael, u9009616
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor480106 - Taxation law
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4455135xPUB634
local.identifier.citationvolume67
local.identifier.doi10.32721/ctj.2019.67.4.sym.kobetsky
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.ctf.ca/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber67

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1077_2019CTJ4-Sym-Kobetsky.pdf
Size:
275 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format