Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Simulation and technology in legal education: a systematic review and future research programme

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Maharg, Paul
Nicol, Emma

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ashgate

Abstract

This chapter is a systematic review of the literature on simulations and technology in legal education. To date, there has been no reasonably comprehensive summary of the research on simulation and technology in legal education - this in spite of a growing body of evidence that games and simulations not only have positive effects on student learning, but that there are significant correlations between the use of educational technology and student engagement. The practice of systematic review generally is relatively rare in legal ecucation, in common law jurisdictions at least. Indeed systematic reviews as a whole, such as that of Mearns et al on the effectiveness of online and blended learning in the field of education and technology, are not widely available in law as a discipline; nor are they evenly distributed in law's sub-domains.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Legal education: simulation in theory and practice

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Used with permission of the Publishers from ��Simulation and technology in legal education: a systematic review��, in Legal Education eds. Caroline Strevens, Richard Grimes and Edward Phillips (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014), pp. 17��42. Copyright � 2014

DOI

Restricted until