Paleo- to Mesoarchean Crustal Growth in the Karwar Block, Southern India: Constraints on TTG Genesis and Archean Tectonics

dc.contributor.authorIshwar-Kumar, C.
dc.contributor.authorSajeev, K.
dc.contributor.authorSatish-Kumar, M.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Ian
dc.contributor.authorWilde, Simon
dc.contributor.authorHokada, T.
dc.contributor.authorWindley, Brian F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-05T23:31:58Z
dc.date.available2025-05-05T23:31:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2023-12-10T07:16:38Z
dc.description.abstractIn this study we present field relations, petrology, whole-rock major, trace and rare earth element geochemistry, zircon U-Pb ages, whole-rock Sr and Nd isotopes, and in situ zircon Hf and O isotopes from the Karwar block, western peninsular India. The rocks consist predominantly of tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG), granite and amphibolite. The felsic rocks are grouped into three: 1. TTG-I characterised by low K2O, high Na2O and Al2O3, low Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, slightly enriched HREEs, negative Sr, Eu and Ti anomalies, a 3.2 Ga crystallisation age, and 3.60 Ga and 3.47 Ga inherited zircons; 2. TTG-II with lower SiO2, higher Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, stronger REE fractionation with no HREE enrichment, negative Nb and Ta anomalies, a 3.2 Ga crystallisation age, but no inheritance; 3. Granites with high SiO2 and K2O, low Na2O and Al2O3, very low Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, weak REE fractionation with enriched REEs, negative Sr, Eu and Ti anomalies and a 2.94 Ga crystallisation age. The TTG-I formed from a mantle source, but with a significant component of older crustal material, whereas the TTG-II originated mostly from a mantle-derived juvenile magma. The granite evolved from an enriched source containing a relatively large amount of older crustal material. The precursors of TTG-I and -II are similar to mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB), whereas the granites are similar to volcanic arc/within-plate sources and the amphibolites are remnants of gabbros/ basalts. An initial 3.6 Ga crust likely formed by the underplating of an accreted oceanic plateau-like or island arc-like crust. TTG-I was produced by subduction and slab melting at a moderate depth, induced melting of mafic lower crust and older upper crust at 3.2 Ga. TTG-II formed at 3.2 Ga by subduction and with a higher degree of slab melting at a greater depth than TTG-1, together with more effective mixing with mantle peridotite, followed by intrusion and induced melting of mafic lower crust. Basaltic magmatism at 3.0 Ga and subsequent metamorphism to amphibolite resulted in extensive and thicker crust. Assimilation and melting of TTG crust at a shallow depth during the emplacement of a mantle-derived magma produced the 2.94 Ga granites. The presence of inherited zircons, combined with whole-rock major and trace elements, Nd isotopes and in situ zircon Hf and O isotopes, indicates that older crustal material was incorporated into the source magma of TTG-I and that the Karwar block originally contained 3.60 to 3.47 Ga crust that was subsequently reworked during the Paleo- and Mesoarchean.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Bruce Godfrey (CEO, Australian Scientific Instruments) for funding the SHRIMP II oxygen isotope analyses at RSES.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0002-9599
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733749227
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherYale University
dc.rights© 2022 The authors
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Science
dc.titlePaleo- to Mesoarchean Crustal Growth in the Karwar Block, Southern India: Constraints on TTG Genesis and Archean Tectonics
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage163
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage108
local.contributor.affiliationIshwar-Kumar, C, University of Leicester
local.contributor.affiliationSajeev, K, Okayama Science University
local.contributor.affiliationSatish-Kumar, M., Niigata University
local.contributor.affiliationWilliams, Ian, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationWilde, Simon, Curtin University of Technology
local.contributor.affiliationHokada, T., National Institute for Polar Research
local.contributor.affiliationWindley, Brian F., The University of Leicester
local.contributor.authoruidWilliams, Ian, u8104453
local.description.embargo2099-12
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor370000 - EARTH SCIENCES
local.identifier.absseo280107 - Expanding knowledge in the earth sciences
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB37834
local.identifier.citationvolume322
local.identifier.doi10.2475/02.2022.02
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85140763919
local.publisher.urlhttps://ajsonline.org/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber322

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
65848-paleo-to-mesoarchean-crustal-growth-in-the-karwar.pdf
Size:
13.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format