Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The MV Saiga (No. 2) case: St Vincent and the Grenadines v Guinea

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Drew, Phillip

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

The third of the ‘trinity’ of oft-cited hot pursuit/use of force in maritime law enforcement cases, MV Saiga (No. 2), is an International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) decision which significantly updated (and in some respects diverged from) the conclusions reached in the earlier I’m Alone and Red Crusader cases. This chapter analyses the background to the incident and its progression to ITLOS, before assessing the key legal issues that arose in the case, including the excessively claimed Guinean customs radius, and the conduct and legitimacy of the claimed hot pursuit. The chapter concludes by noting that it is this case which most accurately reflects modern maritime law enforcement practice in respect to the procedure of hot pursuit and the regulation of use of force in associated maritime law enforcement operations.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Maritime Operations Law in Practice: Key Cases and Incidents

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads