Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Can information on the purpose of spectacle use and age at first use predict refractive error type?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Ip, Jenny
Robaei, Dana
Rochtchina, Elena
Rose, Kathryn
Smith, Wayne
Wang, Jie Jin
Mitchell, Paul

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of predicting refractive error type using information from a four-item questionnaire on the purpose of spectacle use and age at first use. Methods: The Sydney Myopia Study examined 1,740 year 1 (78.9% response) and 2,353 year 7 students (75.3% response) from a random cluster sample of 34 primary and 21 secondary schools across Sydney. Parents of participants completed a four-item questionnaire that sought data on parental spectacle use, age at first use, and purpose of use (for clear distant vision, close work, or both). Prescriptions were obtained for 720 of 3,209 (22%) parents (73% of those approached) for validation. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff age for spectacle use in myopia classification. Results: Using the ROC curve, a cutoff age of 30 years at first spectacle use produced the highest accuracy in determining myopia. We combined information on the purpose for using spectacles (for distant and near vision) and age of first use at 30 years or younger to determine myopia, otherwise hyperopia. Validated against prescriptions, the sensitivity and specificity of these predictions were 0.89 and 0.83, respectively, for myopia. The specificity was 0.92 for hyperopia and 0.80 for astigmatism, though corresponding sensitivities were lower at 0.23 and 0.46, respectively. Conclusions: In a sample of the parents of Sydney Myopia Study participants, information on the purpose of spectacle use with an age-at-first-use criterion can identify myopic refractive error with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. This four-item questionnaire may assist future epidemiological studies of screening for myopia.

Description

Citation

Source

Opthalmic Epidemiology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31
abcd