Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Costs of Reproduction and Terminal Investment by Females in a Semelparous Marsupial

dc.contributor.authorFisher, Diana O.
dc.contributor.authorBlomberg, Simon P.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-30T00:35:46Z
dc.date.available2015-11-30T00:35:46Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-13
dc.date.updated2015-12-10T10:44:21Z
dc.description.abstractEvolutionary explanations for life history diversity are based on the idea of costs of reproduction, particularly on the concept of a trade-off between age-specific reproduction and parental survival, and between expenditure on current and future offspring. Such trade-offs are often difficult to detect in population studies of wild mammals. Terminal investment theory predicts that reproductive effort by older parents should increase, because individual offspring become more valuable to parents as the conflict between current versus potential future offspring declines with age. In order to demonstrate this phenomenon in females, there must be an increase in maternal expenditure on offspring with age, imposing a fitness cost on the mother. Clear evidence of both the expenditure and fitness cost components has rarely been found. In this study, we quantify costs of reproduction throughout the lifespan of female antechinuses. Antechinuses are nocturnal, insectivorous, forest-dwelling small (20-40 g) marsupials, which nest in tree hollows. They have a single synchronized mating season of around three weeks, which occurs on predictable dates each year in a population. Females produce only one litter per year. Unlike almost all other mammals, all males, and in the smaller species, most females are semelparous. We show that increased allocation to current reproduction reduces maternal survival, and that offspring growth and survival in the first breeding season is traded-off with performance of the second litter in iteroparous females. In iteroparous females, increased allocation to second litters is associated with severe weight loss in late lactation and post-lactation death of mothers, but increased offspring growth in late lactation and survival to weaning. These findings are consistent with terminal investment. Iteroparity did not increase lifetime reproductive success, indicating that terminal investment in the first breeding season at the expense of maternal survival (i.e. semelparity) is likely to be advantageous for females.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Australian Research Council (an Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship and an ARF fellowship to DOF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_AU
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/16906
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rights© 2011 Fisher, Blomberg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.sourcePLoS ONE
dc.source.urihttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0015226en_AU
dc.subjectage factors
dc.subjectaging
dc.subjectanimals
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectlactation
dc.subjectlongevity
dc.subjectmarsupialia
dc.subjectreproduction
dc.subjectsurvival
dc.titleCosts of Reproduction and Terminal Investment by Females in a Semelparous Marsupial
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1/9
local.bibliographicCitation.startpagee15226en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFisher, Diana , College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE Research School of Biology, Division of Evolution, Ecology & Genetics, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBlomberg, S.P., University of Queensland, Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidFisher, Diana, u3788306en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor060201en_AU
local.identifier.absfor060308en_AU
local.identifier.absseo970106en_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB1400en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume6en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0015226en_AU
local.identifier.essn1932-6203en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-79251578656
local.publisher.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Fisher_Costs_of_Reproduction_and_2011.pdf
Size:
377.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: