Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Asia's Competitive "Strategic Geometries": The Australian Perspective

dc.contributor.authorTow, William
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T21:57:23Z
dc.date.available2015-12-10T21:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T07:45:06Z
dc.description.abstractRecent changes of government in Australia and Japan, and a pending one in the United States, signifies a historical crossroads in these three allies� security politics in the Asia-Pacific region. In recent years, all three countries have tended to rationalize their strategic collaboration on the need to build innovative and competitive-oriented �strategic geometries� as a means to counter China�s growing power and to meet new types of threats in the region. Yet the Australian Government under John Howard simultaneously pursued a hedging strategy, exploiting its growing economic relationship with China while strengthening its diplomatic and strategic profile with the United States. Despite Tokyo�s own substantial economic relationship with Beijing, recent Japanese leaders were unable to pursue the same type of �dual track� strategy to the same extent as Howard. With Kevin Rudd�s election as the new Australian Prime Minister and Yasuo Fukuda�s ascent to power in Japan, prospects for Australia and Japan to cultivate more independent politico-security ties with Beijing have strengthened. If so, the evolving regional security postures of both these US allies may compel the United States to reassess its own traditional skepticism towards multilateral security groupings in the region.
dc.identifier.issn0129-797X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/39752
dc.publisherInstitute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS)
dc.sourceContemporary Southeast Asia
dc.titleAsia's Competitive "Strategic Geometries": The Australian Perspective
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage51
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage29
local.contributor.affiliationTow, William, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidTow, William, u4043055
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor160607 - International Relations
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9517525xPUB182
local.identifier.citationvolume30
local.identifier.doi10.1355/cs30-1b
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads