Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Poor taxonomy and genetic rescue are possible co-agents of silent extinction and biogeographic homogenization among ungulate mammals

dc.contributor.authorGippoliti, Spartaco
dc.contributor.authorCotterill, Fenton P. D.
dc.contributor.authorGroves, Colin
dc.contributor.authorZinner, Dietmar
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-12T03:41:45Z
dc.date.available2023-12-12T03:41:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2022-09-11T08:16:18Z
dc.description.abstractGenetic rescue is a measure to mitigate the effects of reduced genetic variation in endangered small, isolated (inbreed) populations by introducing new genetic variation into such populations. This is usually accomplished by translocating individuals from a related population, assumed to belong to the same, often polytypic species, into the endangered population. If, however, the taxonomic classification does not reflect the ‘true’ diversity, genetic rescue can have detrimental effects on the survival of the endangered population (e.g. outbreeding depression). Here we point to problems if erroneous taxonomy informs such translocating strategies. Actions that promote artificial admixture of evolutionary lineages may be ineffective, or they may homogenize existing diversity and biogeographic patterns instead of protecting them. The extreme result is to drive target species and/or cryptic lineages to silent extinction. We single out conspicuous examples to illustrate the negative impacts of actions, which have resulted from artificial interbreeding of evolutionary distinct species or ill-conceived ‘genetic augmentation’. In such cases, translocations negate the overarching objective of biodiversity conservation: embodied in the concept of phylogenetic distinctiveness (PD), the encompassing scientific foundation of biodiversity conservation aims to maximize representation of the evolutionary history at the levels of species and ecosystems. A major underlying problem that we identify is persisting taxonomic inertia maintaining e.g., an overly simplified ungulate taxonomy, which is in most cases equivalent to a certain genomic incompatibility or a dilution of specific adaptations. Translocations and genetic rescue should only be employed, if potentially negative effects of the measures can be ruled out (including wrong taxonomy). Poor taxonomy has been – and indeed remains – at fault.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1594-7629en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/309806
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceOpen Access Publications from the University of Californiaen_AU
dc.publisherItalian Biogeography Societyen_AU
dc.rights© 2018 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceBiogeographia - The Journal of Integrative Biogeographyen_AU
dc.subjectArtiodactylaen_AU
dc.subjectEvolutionary Species Concepten_AU
dc.subjectfaunal homogenizationen_AU
dc.subjectgenetic rescueen_AU
dc.subjectPerissodactylaen_AU
dc.subjectspecies translocationen_AU
dc.titlePoor taxonomy and genetic rescue are possible co-agents of silent extinction and biogeographic homogenization among ungulate mammalsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage54en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage41en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGippoliti, Spartaco, Viale Liegien_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCotterill, Fenton P. D., University of Stellenboschen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGroves, Colin, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationZinner, Dietmar, Leibniz Institute for Primate Researchen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGroves, Colin, u7400233en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor310914 - Vertebrate biologyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB12107en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume33en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.21426/B633039045en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85057925016
local.publisher.urlhttps://escholarship.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
eScholarship UC item 4082h92h.pdf
Size:
248.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: