When toxic chemicals refuse to die - An examination of the prolonged mercury pesticide use in Australia

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Larissa
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T21:31:41Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T21:31:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-09-18T08:16:54Z
dc.description.abstractMercury, even in low concentrations, is known to cause severe adverse human health effects. In the early 1900s, mercury became a popular fungicide ingredient, leading to multiple poisoning incidents that forced much of the world to act upon phasing out mercury use in agriculture. These incidents spurred the advancement of mercury science and the implementation of international policies and regulations to control mercury pollution worldwide. Despite these developments internationally, Australia continued using methoxyethyl mercury chloride as a fungicide to treat sugarcane against the fungi Ceratocystis paradoxa (pineapple disease). At the request of the manufacturer and following pressure from Australian researchers and the Minamata Convention on Mercury, Australian authorities announced a ban on mercury-containing pesticide in May 2020. Australia’s unique reluctance to act on controlling this hazardous pollutant makes it an interesting case study for policy inaction that runs counter to global policy trends and evidence-based decision making. As such, it can provide insights into the challenges of achieving multilateral agreement on difficult environmental issues such as global warming. In this review, I discuss the scientific development and policy decisions related to mercury fates and exposure of wildlife and humans in Australia to mercury used in pesticide. The historical uses of mercury pesticide and poisoning incidents worldwide are described to contextualize Australia’s delayed action on banning and controlling this chemical product compared to other nations. Regulations on mercury use in Australia, which has not ratified the Minamata Convention on mercury, are compared to those of major sugarcane and pesticide producer nations (Brazil, China, Japan, India, Thailand, and United States) which have ratified the Convention and replaced mercury pesticides with alternative products. I discuss how mercury regulations have the potential to protect the environment, decrease human exposure to mercury, and safeguard the ban on mercury products. Ratifying the Minamata Convention would give Australia equal footing with its international counterparts in global efforts to control global mercury pollution.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2325-1026en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/305624
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of California Pressen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE180100573en_AU
dc.rights© 2021 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceElementa: science of the anthropoceneen_AU
dc.subjectGreat Barrier Reefen_AU
dc.subjectShirtanen_AU
dc.subjectMEMCen_AU
dc.subjectSugarcaneen_AU
dc.subjectFungicideen_AU
dc.subjectMercury phasing-downen_AU
dc.subjectMercury banen_AU
dc.titleWhen toxic chemicals refuse to die - An examination of the prolonged mercury pesticide use in Australiaen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSchneider, Larissa, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailu5052485@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidSchneider, Larissa, u5052485en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor410501 - Environmental biogeochemistryen_AU
local.identifier.absfor410401 - Conservation and biodiversityen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB21490en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume9en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1525/elementa.2021.053en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85104868563
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000625458600011
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBya383154en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://online.ucpress.edu/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
elementa.2021.053.pdf
Size:
1.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: