Identity Politics or Economics? Explaining Voter Support for Hungary's Illiberal FIDESZ
Abstract
This article tests cultural and economic explanations of why the longest surviving
illiberal government in Central Europe, Hungary’s FIDESZ, has maintained popular
support throughout two elections despite dismantling institutional checks and balances.
Much of the literature on illiberalism in Central Europe attributes the appeal and successes of these governments to the brand of identity politics and rhetorical vilification
of “others” practiced by their leaders. Yet the role of economic growth, a strong determinant of voter behaviour, has received little theoretical attention in accounting for
illiberal party support. Using five rounds of European Social Survey data from 2010 to
2018, I show that economic satisfaction rather than a host of cultural factors, notably
anti-migrant and anti-European Union attitudes, better predicts support for FIDESZ
and satisfaction with government. I examine the implications of these results for understanding and conceptualising voter behaviour under backsliding. Voters may not understand what backsliding is and therefore are unable to penalise it or they may take
information about backsliding into account and judge backsliding to be the price of
prosperity. These findings and the discussion of voter behaviour raise important questions about the role of economic growth in sustaining illiberalism in Central Europe
and other third wave democracies.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
East European Politics and Societies
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31