A reanalysis of the Tikopia obsidians

dc.contributor.authorSpriggs, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorBird, Roger
dc.contributor.authorAmbrose, Wallace
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T21:53:38Z
dc.date.available2015-12-10T21:53:38Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2020-11-22T07:54:23Z
dc.description.abstractIn 1982 an initial sourcing of 13 obsidians and volcanic glasses from Tikopia in the Solomon Islands suggested that four specimens came from Bismarcks sources, with Talasea in West New Britain being the most likely, and the rest came from the Banks Islands. Reanalysis now attributes ten pieces to Banks Islands sources and three to sources in the Admiralty Islands.
dc.identifier.issn0003-8121
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/38588
dc.publisherSydney University Press
dc.sourceArchaeology in Oceania
dc.subjectKeywords: Banks Islands; Density; Obsidian; PIXE-PIGME; Tikopia
dc.titleA reanalysis of the Tikopia obsidians
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage38
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage31
local.contributor.affiliationSpriggs, Matthew, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBird, Roger, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
local.contributor.affiliationAmbrose, Wallace, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidSpriggs, Matthew, u8705877
local.contributor.authoruidAmbrose, Wallace, u4076574
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor210102 - Archaeological Science
local.identifier.absfor210106 - Archaeology of New Guinea and Pacific Islands (excl. New Zealand)
local.identifier.absseo970121 - Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu8304786xPUB163
local.identifier.citationvolume45
local.identifier.doi.1002/j.1834-4453.2010.tb00075.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-77955282539
local.identifier.thomsonID000277658500004
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads