Balancing Efficiency and Equity in the Tax and Transfer System
Date
2018
Authors
Stewart, Miranda
Whiteford, Peter
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge
Abstract
Tax-transfer systems in developed countries balance a range of competing objectives. The tax-transfer system appears quintessentially public – we raise taxes to
fund government goods and services, to achieve redistribution and to address
inequality, while we provide transfers in the welfare state to achieve poverty alleviation and to protect against a range of risks as a form of social insurance.
However, the ‘public’ tax-transfer system is not separate from, but is instead
interdependent with, the ‘private’ labour market and ‘private’ family or household economies, producing a hybrid public–private regime. In seeking to balance
objectives of equity and efficiency in tax-transfer systems, governments are concerned to maximise policy effectiveness and efficiency while minimising adverse
outcomes in relation to incentives to work or save or to form or dissolve families
or households, and ensuring the long-term fiscal sustainability of the system.
This chapter examines the hybrid Australian tax-transfer system in an international comparative perspective, identifying some distinctive design features
and outcomes of Australian arrangements compared to other countries. It first
examines who pays for and benefits from the tax-transfer system, focusing on
the recent topical, but misguided question of who is a ‘net taxpayer’. Second, it
inquires into the fundamental goal of a tax-transfer system with reference to the
goal of improving individual wellbeing while balancing fiscal cost, equity and
efficiency.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book chapter
Book Title
Hybrid Public Policy Innovations: Contemporary Policy Beyond Ideology
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description