Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity
Loading...
Date
Authors
McAlpine, Clive
Catterall, Carla
Mac Nally, Ralph Charles
Reid, J. Leighton
Holl, karen D.
Bennett, Andrew
Runting, Rebecca K.
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Hobbs, Richard
Seabrook, Leonie
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ecological Society of America
Abstract
Ecological restoration of modified and degraded landscapes is an important challenge for the 21st century, with potential for major gains in the recovery of biodiversity. However, there is a general lack of agreement between plant- and animal-based approaches to restoration, both in theory and practice. Here, we review these approaches, identify limitations from failing to effectively integrate their different perspectives, and suggest ways to improve outcomes for biodiversity recovery in agricultural landscapes. We highlight the need to strengthen collaboration between plant and animal ecologists, to overcome disciplinary and cultural differences, and to achieve a more unified approach to restoration ecology. Explicit consideration of key ecosystem functions, the need to plan at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and the importance of plant–animal interactions can provide a bridge between plant- and animal-based methods. A systematic approach to restoration planning is critical to achieving effective biodiversity outcomes while meeting long-term social and economic needs.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description