Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

European community grain and meat policies: effects on international prices, trade and welfare

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Anderson, Kym
Tyers, Rodney

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Abstract

The extent to which policies in the EC reduce the level and increase the instability of international prices of grain and meat is estimated using a dynamic, stochastic, multicommodity simulation model. The results suggest that the EC is responsible for most of the instability in world grain and meat prices that is caused by policies of developed market economies. It is also responsible for more than half of the international price-depressing effects of those countries' policies. The trade and welfare effects of EC protection for the EC and for other major trading countries are also estimated from the model. Should real grain and meat prices within the EC be maintained through the 1980s, the results suggest that export surpluses will continue to grow. This scenario is compared with one in which real EC prices fall by 2% annually through the 1980s. In the latter case, the problem of export surpluses and hence the EC's budgetary problem are substantially reduced. The budgetary problem could also disappear for wheat if a producer levy is applied, but in such a case exports may still increase. Also estimated are the effects of retaliation by the United States in the form of a subsidy on its wheat exports. The adverse effects of such retaliation are much less for the EC than for the United States and are likely to be insufficient to force EC policy reform. Moreover, in per capita terms Canada and Australia are affected much more than the EC.

Description

Citation

Source

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until