Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Limits to the Privatization of Fishery Resources: Comment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Kompas, Thomas
Hilborn, Ray
Grafton, Quentin

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Wisconsin

Abstract

This paper responds to the key findings of Clark, Munro, and Sumaila (2010). We restrict our response to (1) biomass targets and what they do not imply about resource ownership, (2) harvesting costs and the stock effect in fisheries and their implications for fisheries management, and (3) the effect of the intrinsic growth rate on optimal extinction and also dynamic BMEY�the level of the biomass that maximizes the sum of discounted economic returns from fishing. Despite what is asserted by Clark, Munro, and Sumaila (2010), that the deliberate extermination of a fish population may be the private owner�s optimal strategy, we show that such an outcome cannot be presumed and that even with a very low intrinsic growth rate and a much larger discount rate, dynamic BMEY may still exceed the biomass that maximizes the sustainable yield, BMSY.

Description

Citation

Source

Land Economics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until