Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Right of Social Dialogue on Automated Decision-Making: From Workers' Right to Autonomous Right

dc.contributor.authorClifford, Damian
dc.contributor.authorGoldenfein, Jake
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Aitor
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Megan
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-21T23:53:12Z
dc.date.available2025-04-21T23:53:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.updated2023-12-10T07:17:53Z
dc.description.abstractAn emerging tool in the movement for platform workers’ rights is the right not to be subject to automated decision-making. In its most advanced formulation to date in art 22 of the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016, this right includes ‘the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision’. Among other things, art 22 forms part of the groundwork of the December 2021 European Commission Proposal for a Directive on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work, with its mantra of promotion of ‘social dialogue on algorithmic management’. In this article, we argue that art 22 and now the Directive offer an important tool for responding to the mechanistic working conditions of platform work. More broadly, we suggest that a right of social dialogue regarding automated decision-making, which art 22 represents, has the potential to serve as a signal achievement in the history of data rights developing to allow democratic involvement in decisions that affect people’s lives under modern industrial conditions.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2666-139X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733748585
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
dc.publisheropenjournals.nl
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE200100005
dc.rights©2022 The authors
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licence
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceTechnology and Regulation
dc.titleA Right of Social Dialogue on Automated Decision-Making: From Workers' Right to Autonomous Right
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage9
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationClifford, Damian, ANU College of Law, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGoldenfein, Jake, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationJimenez, Aitor, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.affiliationRichardson, Megan, University of Melbourne
local.contributor.authoruidClifford, Damian, u1084045
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor480408 - Law, science and technology
local.identifier.absfor480304 - European Union law
local.identifier.ariespublicationu6602229xPUB84
local.identifier.citationvolume2023
local.identifier.doi10.26116/techreg.2023.001
local.publisher.urlhttps://techreg.org/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber2023

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A right of social dialogue.pdf
Size:
232.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd