Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Future restrictions for sinks in the CDM: how about a cap on supply?

dc.contributor.authorForneri, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorJotzo, Frank
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:40:52Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:40:52Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T09:30:26Z
dc.description.abstractThe first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol is expected to result in only a small role for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), including afforestation and reforestation projects. Wide ranging concerns regarding sinks in the CDM have been reflected in the Marrakech Accords capping the total amount of emission offsets from sinks projects to be used by Annex I countries. Decisions about the second commitment period and beyond are likely to be of far greater importance for these projects. This paper contributes to the discussion on how caps on sinks under the CDM could be used to obtain overall improved outcomes for developing countries. We examine two distinctive ways in which quantitative caps on sinks in the CDM can be implemented: one, restricting the use of sinks CERs to meet targets, as under the Marrakech Accords (a cap on demand); and two, restricting supply of sink CERs using a quota system. We argue in favour of a supply side cap, if Parties are to preserve the idea of limiting sinks in the CDM. Limiting the supply of credits could lead to better financial outcomes for developing countries as a whole, make higher-cost projects viable which may have better sustainability impacts, and provide an alternative to deal with equity concerns between developing countries.
dc.identifier.issn1469-3062
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/94623
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceClimate Policy
dc.subjectKeywords: afforestation; carbon sink; emission control; Kyoto Protocol; quota system; reforestation CDM; Forest; Kyoto Protocol; LULUCF; Supplementarity; Sustainable development
dc.titleFuture restrictions for sinks in the CDM: how about a cap on supply?
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage365
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage353
local.contributor.affiliationForneri, Claudio, Climate Change Secretariat
local.contributor.affiliationJotzo, Frank, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidJotzo, Frank, u3902640
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor040605 - Palaeoclimatology
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub24251
local.identifier.citationvolume2
local.identifier.doi10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00063-3
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0036935180
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads