Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Cycle Accurate Memory Modelling: A Case-Study Variation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Over, Andrew
Strazdins, Peter
Clarke, William

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE Inc)

Abstract

Simulation is an integral tool in performance analysis, however without some knowledge of a simulator's underlying accuracy and limitations, the results may prove wrong or misleading. Timing validation is one aspect of development which is easy to overlook, typically due to the lack of a comparison target at the time the simulator was written. This paper discusses the design and validation of an accurate timing model for an UltraSPARC IIICu-based system. An existing functional simulator was augmented with a cycle-accurate model of the memory hierarchy of a reference system. Key features of the model include the use of a 'bridge' for the processor/memory system interface, the use of event windows between the simulated backplane and processors, implementation of pipelined transactions, and the extension of the processor run loop to support this. The modelling of the store buffer and prefetch mechanisms proved both challenging and important for the model's accuracy. Using a combination of documentation, microbenchmarks, and comparisons of the NAS parallel benchmarks between the simulator and a real machine, it was possible to uncover several undocumented architectural artifacts, and validate the simulator to a reasonable degree. Hardware performance counters and timing information were used to identify the source of discrepancies. Surprisingly, the overhead of introducing the model was within a factor of two, compared with the original functional simulator.

Description

Citation

Source

MASCOTS 2005: 13th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd