Next steps for understanding the selective relevance of female-female competition

Date

2014

Authors

Cain, Kristal E.
Rosvall, Kimberly A.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Frontiers Research Foundation

Abstract

After decades of neglect, recent empirical research on exaggerated female traits (e.g., ornaments, armaments, aggression, acoustic signals, etc.) has revived interest in this widespread but poorly understood phenomenon, and shown that these traits often function in the context of female-female competition (West-Eberhard, 1983; Amundsen, 2000; Clutton-Brock, 2009; Rosvall, 2011a; Stockley and Bro-Jørgensen, 2011; Rubenstein, 2012 [Theme issue]; Stockley and Campbell, 2013 [Theme issue]). However, recent reviews have emphasized the applicability of sexual vs. social selection, rather than rigorously examining the role of different ecological contexts in shaping the evolution of traits used in competitive contexts (hereafter, “competitive traits”) in females. Thus, we still lack a solid understanding of the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms driving the evolution of female trait expression, in particular whether, how, and why these mechanisms vary among species, and between the sexes.

Description

Keywords

competitive traits, costs and benefits, Bateman gradient, social selection, ornamentation, sex differences, intrasexual competition, sexual selection

Citation

Source

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Type

Journal article

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads