Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Resolving Rabin's paradox

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bleichrodt, Han
Doctor, Jason N.
Gao, Yu
Li, Chen
Meeker, Daniella
Wakker, Peter P.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Abstract

We present a theoretical model of Rabin’s famous calibration paradox that resolves confusions in the literature and that makes it possible to identify the causes of the paradox. Using suitable experimental stimuli, we show that the paradox truly violates expected utility and that it is caused by reference dependence. Rabin already showed that utility curvature alone cannot explain his paradox. We, more strongly, do not find any contribution of utility curvature to the explanation of the paradox. We find no contribution of probability weighting either. We conclude that Rabin’s paradox underscores the importance of reference dependence.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution licence

Restricted until

Downloads