Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Evaluation measure for group-based record linkage

dc.contributor.authorNanayakkara, Suranga
dc.contributor.authorChristen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorRanbaduge, Thilina
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, Eilidh
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-20T01:33:30Z
dc.date.available2023-07-20T01:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2022-05-22T08:15:52Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The robustness of record linkage evaluation measures is of high importance since linkage techniques are assessed based on these. However, minimal research has been conducted to evaluate the suitability of existing evaluation measures in the context of linking groups of records. Linkage quality is generally evaluated based on traditional measures such as precision and recall. As we show, these traditional evaluation measures are not suitable for evaluating groups of linked records because they evaluate the quality of individual record pairs rather than the quality of records grouped into clusters. Objectives We highlight the shortcomings of traditional evaluation measures and then propose a novel method to evaluate clustering quality in the context of group-based record linkage. Methods The proposed linkage evaluation method assesses how well individual records have been allocated into predicted groups/clusters with respect to ground-truth data. We first identify the best representative predicted cluster for each ground-truth cluster and, based on the resulting mapping, each record in a ground-truth cluster is assigned to one of seven categories. These categories reflect how well the linkage technique assigned records into groups. Results We empirically evaluate our proposed method using real-world data and show that it better reflects the quality of clusters generated by three group-based record linkage techniques. We also show that traditional measures such as precision and recall can produce ambiguous results whereas our method does not. Conclusions The proposed evaluation method provides unambiguous results regarding the assessed group-based record linkage approaches. The method comprises of seven categories which reflect how each record was predicted, providing more detailed information about the quality of the linkage result. This will help to make better-informed decisions about which linkage technique is best suited for a given linkage application.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by ESRC grants ES/K00574X/2Digitising Scotland and ES/L007487/1 Administrative DataResearch Centre – Scotland. We like to thank Alice Reid (University of Cambridge) and Ros Davies for their work on the Isleof Skye dataset. This work was also partially funded by the Australian Research Council under DP160101934en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2399-4908en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/294449
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceOpen Access under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en)en_AU
dc.publisherSwansea Universityen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP160101934en_AU
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s)en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.enen_AU
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Population Data Scienceen_AU
dc.titleEvaluation measure for group-based record linkageen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue27en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage12en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNanayakkara, Suranga, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChristen, Peter, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRanbaduge, Thilina, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGarrett, Eilidh, University of Essexen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidNanayakkara, Suranga, t1638en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidChristen, Peter, u4021539en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidRanbaduge, Thilina, u5421298en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor460504 - Data qualityen_AU
local.identifier.absfor460502 - Data mining and knowledge discoveryen_AU
local.identifier.absfor460507 - Information extraction and fusionen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB14018en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume4en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1127en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85086433421
local.publisher.urlhttps://ijpds.org/article/view/1127en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nick,+Journal+editor,+1127-Nanayakkara-GroupBasedLinkage.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: