Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Smokers Increasingly Motivated and Able to Quit as Smoking Prevalence Falls: Umbrella and Systematic Review of Evidence Relevant to the "Hardening Hypothesis," Considering Transcendence of Manufactured Doubt

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Miranda
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Melonie
dc.contributor.authorYazidjoglou, Amelia
dc.contributor.authorFord, Laura
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Robyn
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Eryn
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-17T03:27:52Z
dc.date.available2025-03-17T03:27:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2023-12-24T07:15:48Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The “hardening hypothesis” proposes that as the prevalence of smoking in a population declines, there will be a “hardening” of the remaining smoker population. This review examines the evidence regarding smokers’ motivation, dependence, and quitting behavior as smoking prevalence declines, to assess whether population “hardening” (decreasing propensity to quit) or “softening” (the converse) is occurring. Methods MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to July 2019, using terms related to smoking and hardening, for reviews and large, population-based repeat cross-sectional studies. There were additional searches of reference lists and citations of key research articles. Two reviewers screened half the titles and abstracts each, and two reviewers screened full texts independently using tested criteria. Four reviewers independently and systematically extracted data from eligible publications, with one reviewer per study, checked by another reviewer. Results Of 265 titles identified, three reviews and ten repeat cross-sectional studies were included. Reviews concluded that hardening has not occurred among the general smoking population over time. Among repeated cross-sectional studies, five examined motivation, nine examined dependence, five examined hardcore smoking, and two examined quit outcomes. All but one study found a lack of hardening. Most found softening within the smoking population, consistent across hardening indicators, definitions, countries (and tobacco control environments), and time periods examined. Conclusions Tobacco control reduces smoking prevalence and fosters a smoking population more amenable to evidence-based interventions. Based on the weight of the available evidence, the “hardening hypothesis” should be rejected and the reality of softening accepted.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1462-2203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733740341
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.publisherCarfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Group
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1136128
dc.rights©2022 The authors
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licence
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceNicotine and Tobacco Research
dc.subjectsmoking
dc.subjectmotivation
dc.subjecttobacco control
dc.subjectsmokers
dc.titleSmokers Increasingly Motivated and Able to Quit as Smoking Prevalence Falls: Umbrella and Systematic Review of Evidence Relevant to the "Hardening Hypothesis," Considering Transcendence of Manufactured Doubt
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.bibliographicCitation.issue8
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1328
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1321
local.contributor.affiliationHarris, Miranda, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMartin, Melonie, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationYazidjoglou, Amelia, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationFord, Laura, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationLucas, Robyn, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationNewman, Eryn, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBanks, Emily, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidHarris, Miranda, u1082066
local.contributor.authoruidMartin, Melonie, u5151485
local.contributor.authoruidYazidjoglou, Amelia, u5350133
local.contributor.authoruidFord, Laura, u4924611
local.contributor.authoruidLucas, Robyn, u4002313
local.contributor.authoruidNewman, Eryn, u1058078
local.contributor.authoruidBanks, Emily, u4106314
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor520304 - Health psychology
local.identifier.absfor420201 - Behavioural epidemiology
local.identifier.absfor420699 - Public health not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.absseo209999 - Other health not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.absseo200599 - Specific population health (excl. Indigenous health) not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.absseo200401 - Behaviour and health
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB36151
local.identifier.citationvolume24
local.identifier.doi10.1093/ntr/ntac055
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85134432476
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber24

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ntac055.pdf
Size:
285.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format