Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Factors to consider when applying transcranial magnetic stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex when resting motor threshold is asymmetric: A case study

dc.contributor.authorMaller, Jerome
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Richard H.S.
dc.contributor.authorMcQueen, Susan
dc.contributor.authorElliot, David
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Paul B.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T23:19:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:33:24Z
dc.description.abstractTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an increasingly popular tool in treating psychiatric conditions. The dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is typically targeted for stimulation, with magnetic field intensity being calibrated by establishing resting motor threshold (RMT) at hand region of primary motor cortex (M1 hand). This presumes that scalp-to-cortex distance (SCD) and cortical thickness is similar at both sites. We present data from a patient who had very asymmetricalRMTs (47 and 78). We investigated SCDs in this patient at the M1 hand and DLPFC, and the M1 hand cortical thickness. We also investigated TMS electric field distribution. The M1 hand SCD and cortical thickness of the M1 hand was larger on the side with higher RMT. Electric field finite element modelling demonstrated the focal point did not effectively reach the M1 hand with higher RMT as the postcentral gyrus was shunting it. Hence, successful DLPFC treatment was based upon the side with lower RMT. This study highlights the importance of tailoring DLPFC treatment intensity not only based on RMT at the M1 hand, and upon the degree to which SCD distance differs between sites, but also based upon size, shape, and density of M1 hand, as well as electric field distribution .
dc.identifier.issn0197-8462
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/102790
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Inc.
dc.sourceBioelectromagnetics
dc.titleFactors to consider when applying transcranial magnetic stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex when resting motor threshold is asymmetric: A case study
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage135
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage130
local.contributor.affiliationMaller, Jerome, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationThomson, Richard H.S., The Alfred & Monash University
local.contributor.affiliationMcQueen, Susan, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School
local.contributor.affiliationElliot, David, The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School
local.contributor.affiliationFitzgerald, Paul B., The Alfred & Monash University
local.contributor.authoruidMaller, Jerome, u3981053
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111714 - Mental Health
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB3491
local.identifier.citationvolume37
local.identifier.doi10.1002/bem.21955
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84958873788
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Maller_Factors_to_consider_when_2016.pdf
Size:
704.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format