Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Options for Prosecuting Russian Aggression Against Ukraine: A Critical Analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Heller, Kevin

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

In the wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, there is broad consensus – at least in the Global NorthFootnote1 – that Russian leaders must be prosecuted for the crime of aggression. That consensus, however, does not extend to how Russian aggression should be prosecuted. Some commentators argue that the International Criminal Court (ICC) is the most appropriate forum, even if enlivening the Court’s jurisdiction requires amending the Rome Statute. Others call either for an ad hoc international tribunal similar to the ICTY and ICTR or for a hybrid tribunal based in the Ukrainian judicial system and supported by the Council of Europe. And still others advocate for national prosecutions conducted by Ukraine itself or by third states that have universal jurisdiction over aggression.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Genocide Research

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31