An updating-based working memory load alters the dynamics of eye movements but not their spatial extent during free viewing of natural scenes

dc.contributor.authorWyche, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Mark
dc.contributor.authorGoodhew, Stephanie Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T06:32:29Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T06:32:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-19
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between spatial deployments of attention and working memory load is an important topic of study, with clear implications for real-world tasks such as driving. Previous research has generally shown that attentional breadth broadens under higher load, while exploratory eye-movement behaviour also appears to change with increasing load. However, relatively little research has compared the effects of working memory load on different kinds of spatial deployment, especially in conditions that require updating of the contents of working memory rather than simple retrieval. The present study undertook such a comparison by measuring participants' attentional breadth (via an undirected Navon task) and their exploratory eye-movement behaviour (a free-viewing recall task) under low and high updating working memory loads. While spatial aspects of task performance (attentional breadth, and peripheral extent of image exploration in the free-viewing task) were unaffected by the load manipulation, the exploratory dynamics of the free-viewing task (including fixation durations and scan-path lengths) changed under increasing load. These findings suggest that temporal dynamics, rather than the spatial extent of exploration, are the primary mechanism affected by working memory load during the spatial deployment of attention. Further, individual differences in exploratory behaviour were observed on the free-viewing task: all metrics were highly correlated across working memory load blocks. These findings suggest a need for further investigation of individual differences in eye-movement behaviour; potential factors associated with these individual differences, including working memory capacity and persistence versus flexibility orientations, are discussed.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by an Australian Government Research Training program scholarship awarded to N. J. W.; an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT170100021] awarded to S. C. G.; and an Australian Research Council Discovery Project [DP190103103] awarded to M. E.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1943-3921en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/296701
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_AU
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT170100021en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP190103103en_AU
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International)en_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceAttention, Perception & Psychophysicsen_AU
dc.subjectattentional breadthen_AU
dc.subjecteye movementsen_AU
dc.subjectscene-viewingen_AU
dc.subjectupdatingen_AU
dc.subjectvisual attentionen_AU
dc.subjectworking memoryen_AU
dc.titleAn updating-based working memory load alters the dynamics of eye movements but not their spatial extent during free viewing of natural scenesen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen accessen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-05-24
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage22en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWyche, N., School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationEdwards, M., School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGoodhew, S. C., School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu5796519en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.3758/s13414-023-02741-1en_AU
local.identifier.essn1943-393Xen_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s13414-023-02741-1 (1).pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13414_2023_2741_MOESM1_ESM (1).pdf
Size:
232.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: