Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Snark hunting: Progressive transformative possibilities in Australia's corporate law

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Wishart, David

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Butterworths

Abstract

There has been little or no reform of Australian corporations law resulting from the furore over the James Hardie transactions, despite hopes and expectations. This article asks why this might be so. There appears to be no plot involved, although there may be a prevailing discourse amongst policy-makers that would make reform difficult. If reform is nevertheless to take place, something should be done. Given the path taken by Australian corporations law, concrete, bulletproof reform proposals for public interest derogations from shareholder primacy are required. This article suggests a process to develop and enact such proposals. It also indicates that there might be more at stake than change in the law

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of Corporate Law

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until