Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Rubisco is not really so bad

dc.contributor.authorBathellier, Camille
dc.contributor.authorTcherkez, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorLorimer, George H.
dc.contributor.authorFarquhar, Graham
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T04:31:18Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T04:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-23
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T11:53:31Z
dc.description.abstractRibulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) is the most widespread carboxylating enzyme in autotrophic organisms. Its kinetic and structural properties have been intensively studied for more than half a century. Yet important aspects of the catalytic mechanism remain poorly understood, especially the oxygenase reaction. Because of its relatively modest turnover rate (a few catalytic events per second) and the competitive inhibition by oxygen, Rubisco is often viewed as an inefficient catalyst for CO2 fixation. Considerable efforts have been devoted to improving its catalytic efficiency, so far without success. In this review, we re-examine Rubisco's catalytic performance by comparison with other chemically related enzymes. We find that Rubisco is not especially slow. Furthermore, considering both the nature and the complexity of the chemical reaction, its kinetic properties are unremarkable. Although not unique to Rubisco, oxygenation is not systematically observed in enolate and enamine forming enzymes and cannot be considered as an inevitable consequence of the mechanism. It is more likely the result of a compromise between chemical and metabolic imperatives. We argue that a better description of Rubisco mechanism is still required to better understand the link between CO2 and O2 reactivity and the rationale of Rubisco diversification and evolution.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipC. B. and G. D. F. acknowledge funding by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis (Project CE140100015), and G. T. thanks the Australian Research Council for its support via a Fellowship under contract FT140100645.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.citationBathellier C, Tcherkez G, Lorimer GH, Farquhar GD. Rubisco is not really so bad. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13149en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0140-7791en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/231026
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenancehttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/7155..."Author accepted manuscript can be made open access on non-commercial institutional repository after 12 month embargo" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 27.4.2021).en_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE140100015en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT140100645en_AU
dc.rights© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_AU
dc.sourcePlant Cell and Environmenten_AU
dc.subjectCO2en_AU
dc.subjectcarbon reactionsen_AU
dc.subjectcarboxylationen_AU
dc.subjectcatalytic efficiencyen_AU
dc.subjectoxygenaseen_AU
dc.subjectphotosynthesisen_AU
dc.subjectrubiscoen_AU
dc.titleRubisco is not really so baden_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-09
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage716en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage705en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBathellier, Camille, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTcherkez, Guillaume, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLorimer, George H., University of Marylanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFarquhar, Graham, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBathellier, Camille, t1557en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidTcherkez, Guillaume, u4641357en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidFarquhar, Graham, u7601091en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor060705 - Plant Physiologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo970106 - Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB9476en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume41en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/pce.13149en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85042560504
local.publisher.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/en_AU
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pce.13149.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author Accepted Manuscript