Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Diurnal and seasonal variation in light and dark respiration in field-grown Eucalyptus pauciflora

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Way, Danielle
Holly, Chris
Bruhn, Dan
Ball, Marilyn
Atkin, Owen

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Heron Publishing

Abstract

Respiration from vegetation is a substantial part of the global carbon cycle and the responses of plant respiration to daily and seasonal fluctuations in temperature and light must be incorporated in models of terrestrial respiration to accurately predict these CO<inf>2</inf> fluxes. We investigated how leaf respiration (R) responded to changes in leaf temperature (T<inf>leaf</inf>) and irradiance in field-grown saplings of an evergreen tree (Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng). Seasonal shifts in the thermal sensitivity of leaf R in the dark (R<inf>dark</inf>) and in the light (R<inf>light</inf>) were assessed by allowing T<inf>leaf</inf> to vary over the day in field-grown leaves over a year. The Q<inf>10</inf> of R (i.e., the relative increase in R for a 10 °C increase in T<inf>leaf</inf>) was similar for R<inf>light</inf> and R<inf>dark</inf> and had a value of ∼2.5; there was little seasonal change in the Q<inf>10</inf> of either R<inf>light</inf> or R<inf>dark</inf>, indicating that we may be able to use similar functions to model short-Term temperature responses of R in the dark and in the light. Overall, rates of R<inf>light</inf> were lower than those of R<inf>dark</inf>, and the ratio of R<inf>light</inf>/R<inf>dark</inf> tended to increase with rising T<inf>leaf</inf>, such that light suppression of R was reduced at high T<inf>leaf</inf> values, in contrast to earlier work with this species. Our results suggest we cannot assume that R<inf>light</inf>/R<inf>dark</inf> decreases with increasing T<inf>leaf</inf> on daily timescales, and highlights the need for a better mechanistic understanding of what regulates light suppression of R in leaves.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Tree Physiology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31