Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

What to do with the Other in Human Rights Law? Ethics of Alterity versus Ethics of Care

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Gozdecka, Dorota Anna
Koulu, Sanna

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Abstract

Traditionally, law is well suited for resolving certain kinds of conflicts: for instance, conflicts between the parties to a market transaction or criminal acts where the perpetrator and victim do not know each other. What these conflicts have in common is their reasonably clear-cut nature. It is often clear who is at fault, and only in special cases will the personal traits or circumstances of the parties be taken into account. It is considered both legally correct and ethically reasonable that the party at fault will be liable to pay compensation for breach of contract or that the person intentionally committing a crime will be held responsible.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Subjectivity, Citizenship and Belonging in Law: Identities and Intersections

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2037-12-31