The use and utility of surrogates in biodiversity monitoring programmes
Loading...
Date
Authors
Sato, Chloe
Westgate, Martin J.
Barton, Philip
Foster, Claire
O'Loughlin, Luke S.
Pierson, Jennifer C.
Balmer, Jayne
Chapman, Jane
Catt, Gareth
Detto, Tanya
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
British Ecological Society
Abstract
Monitoring programmes are intended to inform effective biodiversity conservation and management (Legge et al. 2018). Well‐designed programmes can establish baseline conditions, determine trends in threatened species populations, quantify the effects of management, and provide warning of ecosystem changes (Magurran et al. 2010). For these reasons, biodiversity monitoring underpins the activities of land management agencies worldwide. However, it is not always possible to directly monitor key variables at ideal spatio‐temporal resolutions, due to resourcing or logistic constraints. For example, direct monitoring of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) can be cost‐ and time‐intensive as koalas are cryptic, occur at low densities, and are difficult to reliably observe in dense forest canopies (McAlpine et al. 2006).
Description
Citation
Sato, C.F., Westgate, M.J., Barton, P.S., Foster, C.N., O’Loughlin, L.S., Pierson, J.C., Balmer. J., Chapman, J., Catt, G., Detto, T., Hawcroft, A., Kavanagh, R.P., Marshall, D., McKay, M., Moseby, K., Perry, M., Robinson, D., Schroder, M., Tuft, K. and Lindenmayer, D.B. (2019). The use and utility of surrogates in biodiversity monitoring programmes. Journal of Applied Ecology, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13366.
Collections
Source
Journal of Applied Ecology
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description