Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Eucalypts forming a canopy functional type in dry sclerophyll forests respond differentially to environment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Anderson, Jay E
Kriedemann, Paul E
Austin, M
Farquhar, Graham

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Eucalyptus dives Schauer, E. mannifera Mudie, and E. rossii R. Baker & H.G. Smith are sympatric trees that form a canopy functional type in dry sclerophyll forests of south-eastern Australia. Although their ranges broadly overlap, distributions of the three species differ subtly within an abstract environmental space defined by mean annual temperature and precipitation. We used a combination of common environment and field studies to assess the extent to which these eucalypts might respond differentially to environmental conditions and to determine whether distributional differences are related to physiological or morphological attributes of leaves. In three glasshouse experiments, gas exchange characteristics of E. dives and E. rossii seedlings were remarkably similar. However, data indicated that E. rossii makes more efficient use of nutrients and, under some conditions, has higher water-use efficiency than the other species. In five natural stands, there were significant differences among sites and among species for leaf nitrogen and phosphorus content, carbon isotope discrimination, and specific leaf area. Significant site x leaf-variable interactions showed that the species responded differentially to unique site conditions. At four of the five sites,13C discrimination was significantly higher in E. mannifera than in the other two species, and it was significantly higher in E. mannifera than in E. rossii at all five sites. Lower water-use efficiency may restrict E. mannifera to sites on the higher end of the precipitation gradient, whereas higher water-use efficiency may give E. rossii an advantage on arid sites. Variation in specific leaf area across sites was greater in E. mannifera and E. rossii than in E. dives; in contrast, E. dives was more variable in13C discrimination. Greater physiological plasticity could explain why E. dives occupies a broader range of habitats than the other two species. Contrary to expectations, no leaf variable was strongly correlated with the amount of rainfall received at the sites, but13C discrimination was negatively related to mean annual radiation received, which may be a better index of water availability. Despite similarities in gas exchange physiology, members of this putative functional type clearly respond differentially to varying environmental conditions, implying that accurate prediction of responses to environmental change would require knowledge of attributes of each species. However, differential responses might contribute to functional stability on a site subjected to environmental variability.

Description

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of Botany

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until