Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Poor-quality monitoring data underestimate the impact of Australia's megafires on a critically endangered songbird

dc.contributor.authorCrates, Ross
dc.contributor.authorRayner, Laura
dc.contributor.authorStojanovic, Dejan
dc.contributor.authorScheele, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorRoff, Adam
dc.contributor.authorMacKenzie, Jason
dc.contributor.authorHeinsohn, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T04:32:45Z
dc.date.available2023-05-12T04:32:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-03-06T07:17:12Z
dc.description.abstractAim: Catastrophic events such as south-eastern Australia's 2019/20 megafires are predicted to increase in frequency and severity under climate change. Rapid, well-informed conservation prioritization will become increasingly crucial for minimizing biodiversity losses resulting from megafires. However, such assessments are susceptible to bias, because the quality of monitoring data underpinning knowledge of species' distributions is highly variable and they fail to account for differences in life history traits such as aggregative breeding. We aimed to assess how impact estimates of the 2019/20 megafires on the critically endangered regent honeyeater Anthochaera phrygia varied according to the quality of available input data and assessment methodology. Innovation: Using Google Earth Engine Burnt Area Mapping, we estimated the impact of the megafires on the regent honeyeater using six monitoring datasets that differ in quality and temporal span. These datasets are representative of the variable quality of monitoring data available for assessing fire impact on 326 other threatened species; most are poorly monitored, and few have standardized, species-specific monitoring programmes. We found that assessments based on area of occupancy (AOO), extent of occurrence (EOO) and public sightings underestimated the fire impact relative to recent, targeted monitoring datasets: a MaxEnt model, sightings from a national monitoring programme and nest locations since 2015. Using an impact threshold of 30% of habitat burned, regent honeyeaters would not meet these criteria using estimates derived from EOO, AOO or public sightings, but would exceed the cut-off based on estimates derived from the targeted monitoring data that account for population density. Main conclusions: To ensure that conservation prioritization has the greatest capacity to minimize biodiversity losses, we highlight the need to improve targeted, threatened species monitoring. We demonstrate the importance of using recent, standardized monitoring data to estimate accurately the impact of major ecological disturbances, particularly for declining, nomadic species undergoing range contractions.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipField research was conducted under scientific licence #SL101580 and ANU animal ethics licence #A2015/28.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/291016
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_AU
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceDiversity and Distributionsen_AU
dc.subjectbiodiversity conservationen_AU
dc.subjectendangered speciesen_AU
dc.subjectimpact assessmenten_AU
dc.subjectpopulation monitoringen_AU
dc.titlePoor-quality monitoring data underestimate the impact of Australia's megafires on a critically endangered songbirden_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage514en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage506en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCrates, Ross, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRayner, Laura, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationStojanovic, Dejan, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationScheele, Benjamin, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRoff, Adam, New South Wales Department of Planning, Industry and Environmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMacKenzie, Jason, geoADAPTen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHeinsohn, Robert, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidCrates, Ross, u5476383en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidRayner, Laura, u4819975en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidStojanovic, Dejan, u4799452en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidScheele, Benjamin, u4408124en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidHeinsohn, Robert, u8406391en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor410401 - Conservation and biodiversityen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB21161en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume28en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.13385en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85112069643
local.identifier.thomsonID000682439000001
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.wiley.com/en-gben_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Diversity and Distributions - 2021 - Crates - Poor‐quality monitoring data underestimate the impact of Australia s.pdf
Size:
1.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: