Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Looking Back to Look Ahead

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Thakur, Ramesh

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)

Abstract

The article looks at the origins and evolution of R2P and examines ongoing debates about it and the principle’s current status. Interventions were frequent before R2P was formulated in 2001 and are not guaranteed after R2P’s unanimous adoption in 2005. Atrocities will still be committed and the international community will struggle to respond to them in time and effectively. In contrast to controversial “humanitarian interventions”, R2P, especially when backed by legitimacy criteria that have been agreed in advance, at least helps to shift the balance towards interventions that are rule-based, multilateral and consensual. To that extent it helps the world to be better prepared – normatively, organizationally and operationally – to deal with crises of humanitarian atrocities, as they arise, without guaranteeing good outcomes.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Pathways to Peace and Security

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access via publisher website

License Rights

Restricted until