Reply to Brook et al: No empirical evidence for human overkill of megafauna in Sahul
Loading...
Date
Authors
Archer, M.
Mooney, S
Wroe, Steve
Field, Judith
Grayson, Donald
Price, Gilbert
Webb, Gregory
Louys, Julien
Davidson, Iain
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
We welcome comments by Brook et al. (1), supporters of human-driven models, on our review of the role of climate in Pleistocene faunal extinctions in Sahul (Pleistocene Australia–New Guinea) (2). In response, we begin on a point of agreement: the fossil fauna record on which our respective arguments are based is sparse, although our understanding of Pleistocene environmental conditions is improving (3⇓–5). However, we also flag a basic point of difference. Unlike Brook et al., who focus on the ∼50 extinct Australian species (an artificial distinction because Australia was part of the larger landmass Sahul) and the 50 ka since human arrival, we consider the bigger picture, and the 88 large taxa that disappeared from Sahul from ∼450 ka.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description