Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Reply to Brook et al: No empirical evidence for human overkill of megafauna in Sahul

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Archer, M.
Mooney, S
Wroe, Steve
Field, Judith
Grayson, Donald
Price, Gilbert
Webb, Gregory
Louys, Julien
Davidson, Iain

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

We welcome comments by Brook et al. (1), supporters of human-driven models, on our review of the role of climate in Pleistocene faunal extinctions in Sahul (Pleistocene Australia–New Guinea) (2). In response, we begin on a point of agreement: the fossil fauna record on which our respective arguments are based is sparse, although our understanding of Pleistocene environmental conditions is improving (3⇓–5). However, we also flag a basic point of difference. Unlike Brook et al., who focus on the ∼50 extinct Australian species (an artificial distinction because Australia was part of the larger landmass Sahul) and the 50 ka since human arrival, we consider the bigger picture, and the 88 large taxa that disappeared from Sahul from ∼450 ka.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until