Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The galaxy stellar mass function to z = 0.1 from the r-band selected equatorial regions

dc.contributor.authorWright, Angus. H.
dc.contributor.authorDriver, Simon P
dc.contributor.authorAlpaslan, M.
dc.contributor.authorBaldry, I. K.
dc.contributor.authorColless, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorBland-Hawthorn, Joss
dc.contributor.authorBrough, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorLoveday, Jon
dc.contributor.authorPhillipps, S
dc.contributor.authorWilkins, S M
dc.contributor.authorLima da Cunha, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorKafle, P R
dc.contributor.authorKelvin, L S
dc.contributor.authorMaddox, Steve J
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-20T20:56:48Z
dc.date.available2020-12-20T20:56:48Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T10:34:52Z
dc.description.abstractWe derive the low-redshift galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF), inclusive of dust corrections, for the equatorial Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) data set covering 180 deg2. We construct the mass function using a density-corrected maximum volume method, using masses corrected for the impact of optically thick and thin dust. We explore the galactic bivariate brightness plane (M⋆–μ), demonstrating that surface brightness effects do not systematically bias our mass function measurement above 107.5 M⊙. The galaxy distribution in the M–μ plane appears well bounded, indicating that no substantial population of massive but diffuse or highly compact galaxies are systematically missed due to the GAMA selection criteria. The GSMF is fitted with a double Schechter function, with M⋆=1010.78±0.01±0.20M⊙ , ϕ⋆1=(2.93±0.40)×10−3h370 Mpc−3, α1 = −0.62 ± 0.03 ± 0.15, ϕ⋆2=(0.63±0.10)×10−3h370 Mpc−3 and α2 = −1.50 ± 0.01 ± 0.15. We find the equivalent faint end slope as previously estimated using the GAMA-I sample, although we find a higher value of M⋆ . Using the full GAMA-II sample, we are able to fit the mass function to masses as low as 107.5  M⊙, and assess limits to 106.5  M⊙. Combining GAMA-II with data from G10-COSMOS, we are able to comment qualitatively on the shape of the GSMF down to masses as low as 106 M⊙. Beyond the well-known upturn seen in the GSMF at 109.5, the distribution appears to maintain a single power-law slope from 109 to 106.5. We calculate the stellar mass density parameter given our best-estimate GSMF, finding Ω⋆=1.66+0.24−0.23±0.97h−170×10−3 , inclusive of random and systematic uncertainties.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/218060
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
dc.titleGalaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The galaxy stellar mass function to z = 0.1 from the r-band selected equatorial regions
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage302
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage283
local.contributor.affiliationWright, Angus. H., University of Western Australia
local.contributor.affiliationDriver, Simon P, University of St Andrews
local.contributor.affiliationAlpaslan, M., NASA Ames Research Centre
local.contributor.affiliationBaldry, I. K., Liverpool John Moores University
local.contributor.affiliationColless, Matthew, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBland-Hawthorn, Joss, University of Sydney
local.contributor.affiliationBrough, Sarah, Australian Astronomical Observatory
local.contributor.affiliationLoveday, Jon, University of Sussex
local.contributor.affiliationPhillipps, S, University of Bristol
local.contributor.affiliationWilkins, S M, University of Sussex
local.contributor.affiliationLima da Cunha, Elisabete, College of Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationKafle, P R, The University of Western Australia
local.contributor.affiliationKelvin, L S, University of Western Australia
local.contributor.affiliationMaddox, Steve J, University of Nottingham
local.contributor.authoruidColless, Matthew, u9300169
local.contributor.authoruidLima da Cunha, Elisabete, u6091514
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor020199 - Astronomical and Space Sciences not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB7413
local.identifier.citationvolume470
local.identifier.doi10.1093/mnras/stx1149
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85021787881
local.identifier.thomsonID000406842600020
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads