Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Moral Responsibility for Coerced Wrongdoing: The Case of Abused Women Who 'Fail to Protect' Their Children

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Friedman, Marilyn

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

Women in abusive relationships are highly vulnerable to coercion by their abusers in a variety of ways. This essay explores one way in which abusive relationships may compromise the moral agency of an abused woman in cases where the same man who is abusing the woman is also abusing children in her care. Courts have sometimes charged such women with "failure to protect" their children from this abuse. This essay considers three ways of assessing whether or not the women have diminished responsibility for the abuse inflicted on the children: justification, exemption, and excuse. It argues that although the women�s actions are not typically justified and the women are not typically exempt from moral responsibility altogether, nevertheless the women should usually be understood as excused for failing to protect their children from abuse because of the difficulty of resisting the abuser�s threat of further harm.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2037-12-31