Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Mind the "Happiness" Gap: The Relationship between Cohabitation, Marriage and Subjective Well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany and Norway

dc.contributor.authorPerelli-Harris, Brienna
dc.contributor.authorHoherz, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorLappegard, Trude
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T04:16:30Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T04:16:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T07:47:37Z
dc.description.abstractMany studies have found that married people have higher subjective well-being than those who are not married. Yet the increase in cohabitation raises questions as to whether only marriage has beneficial effects. In this study, we examine differences in subjective well-being between cohabiting and married men and women in midlife, comparing the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Norway. We apply propensity score–weighted regression analyses to examine selection processes into marriage and differential treatment bias. We find no differences between cohabitation and marriage for men in the United Kingdom and Norway, and women in Germany. However, we do find significant differences for men in Australia and women in Norway. The differences disappear after we control for selection in Australia, but they unexpectedly persist for Norwegian women, disappearing only when we account for relationship satisfaction. For German men and British and Australian women, those with a lower propensity to marry would benefit from marriage. Controls eliminate differences for German men, although not for U.K. women, but relationship satisfaction reduces differences. Overall, our study indicates that especially after selection and relationship satisfaction are taken into account, differences between marriage and cohabitation disappear in all countries. Marriage does not lead to higher subjective well-being; instead, cohabitation is a symptom of economic and emotional strain.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has received funding from European Research Council Grant 263794 CHILDCOHAB, the UK Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Population Change (Grant RES625-28-0001), Australian Research Council Discovery Project funding (DP110104439), and Research Council of Norway grant (236926/H20). Understanding Society is an initiative funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and various government departments, with scientific leadership by the Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, and survey delivery by NatCen Social Research and Kantar Public. The research data are distributed by the UK Data Service. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) was distributed by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlinen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0070-3370en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/202628
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_AU
dc.publisherPopulation Association of Americaen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP110104439en_AU
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceDemographyen_AU
dc.titleMind the "Happiness" Gap: The Relationship between Cohabitation, Marriage and Subjective Well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany and Norwayen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1246en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1219en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPerelli-Harris, Brienna, Uiversity of Southamptonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHoherz, Stefanie, University of Southamptonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLappegard, Trude, Statistics Norwayen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationEvans, Heather (Ann), College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidEvans, Heather (Ann), u9407331en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor160301 - Family and Household Studiesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3555277xPUB368en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume56en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s13524-019-00792-4en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85068914800
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.comen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Perelli-Harris2019_Article_MindTheHappinessGapTheRelation.pdf
Size:
519.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format