Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Do interventions with staff in long-term residential facilities improve quality of care or quality for life people with dementia? A systematic review of the evidence

dc.contributor.authorBird, Mike
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorMacPherson, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorBlair, Annaliese
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-14T04:40:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.description.abstractBackground: Common sense suggests and research indicates relationships between staff factors in residential dementia care and quality of life (QOL) for residents, with poor care increasing suffering. However, we do not have a coherent picture of which staff interventions have an impact on quality of care (QOC) or resident QOL. Methods: A comprehensive search of 20 years’ peer-reviewed literature using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration identified 4,760 studies meriting full text review. Forty-six met the inclusion criteria, namely interventions in long-term facilities helping staff develop their capacity to provide better care and/or QOL for residents with dementia. Thirty-five other papers comprised an associated predictor review. Results: Conclusions from these limited data are further compromised because nine studies failed to measure effects on residents and only half assessed effects after the project team withdrew. Of these, excellent studies produced change over the medium (3–4 months) or longer term, including reduction in challenging behavior and restraint use but this applied only to a minority. A number of studies failed to measure effects on QOC, limiting conclusions about mechanisms underlying change. Conclusion: In general, level of intervention required depended on the target. For outcomes like restraint use, structured education sessions with some support appear adequate. Programs to reduce pain require more support. For complicated issues like challenging behavior and increasing co-operation in showering, detailed, supportive, on-site interventions are required. Improvements in restraint and staff/resident interactions were the most promising findings. (Review registration number: PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014015224).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1041-6102en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/295563
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenancehttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/1604/..."The accepted version can be archived in an institutional repository. 6 months embargo" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 11/09/2023)
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT9100000en_AU
dc.rights© 2016 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licence
dc.sourceInternational psychogeriatricsen_AU
dc.subjectdementiaen_AU
dc.subjectinterventionsen_AU
dc.subjectquality of careen_AU
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_AU
dc.subjectresidentialen_AU
dc.subjectstaffen_AU
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_AU
dc.subjectageden_AU
dc.subjecthealth personnelen_AU
dc.subjecthumansen_AU
dc.subjectpatient care managementen_AU
dc.subjectprofessional-patient relationsen_AU
dc.subjectquality improvementen_AU
dc.subjectquality of health careen_AU
dc.subjectworkforceen_AU
dc.subjectlong-term careen_AU
dc.subjectresidential facilitiesen_AU
dc.titleDo interventions with staff in long-term residential facilities improve quality of care or quality for life people with dementia? A systematic review of the evidenceen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.bibliographicCitation.issue12en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1963en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1937en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, K., ANU College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAnderson, Katrina, u3104128en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume28en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1017/S1041610216001083en_AU
local.identifier.essn1741-203Xen_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.cambridge.org/en_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bird et al 2016. Do interventions with staff improve QOC QOL_Sys review_Pre-print copy.pdf
Size:
1.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format