Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review Advisory Committee post-implementation review of MBS telehealth items: abolition of initial telehealth consultations for non-general practitioner specialists

dc.contributor.authorLooi, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorBastiampillai, Tarun
dc.contributor.authorKisely, Steve
dc.contributor.authorPring, William
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T03:54:35Z
dc.date.available2024-06-17T03:54:35Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2024-05-19T08:17:59Z
dc.description.abstractIn 2022, the Australian Federal Minister for Health and Aged Care commissioned the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review Advisory Committee (MRAC) to conduct a post-implementation review of MBS telehealth services, including settings of video and telephone consultations. The MRAC has made a series of administrative recommendations for telehealth practice that appear at cross-purposes to the evidence-base on medical consultations and that would limit patient access to medical specialist assessment in Australia. These recommendations particularly underestimate the role of telehealth in rural and remote Australia and did not take into account high patient satisfaction with telehealth assessment and treatment during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. They also appear to contradict the Medical Board of Australia's guidance on telehealth. On this basis, the recommendations for telehealth principles and abolition of reimbursement for telehealth for all initial non-general practitioner medical specialist consultations should be withdrawn.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0156-5788
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733713233
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherAustralian Hospital Association
dc.rights© 2024 The authors
dc.sourceAustralian Health Review
dc.subjectclinical pathways
dc.subjecte-health
dc.subjecthealth funding and financing
dc.subjectMedicare Benefits Schedule,
dc.subjectquality and safety
dc.subjectrural and remote health
dc.subjecttelehealth
dc.subjecturgent care.
dc.titleMedicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review Advisory Committee post-implementation review of MBS telehealth items: abolition of initial telehealth consultations for non-general practitioner specialists
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage36
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage34
local.contributor.affiliationLooi, Jeffrey, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationAllison, Stephen, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationBastiampillai, Tarun, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationKisely, Steve, University of Queensland
local.contributor.affiliationPring, William, Monash University
local.contributor.authoruidLooi, Jeffrey, u4593152
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor420313 - Mental health services
local.identifier.absseo200409 - Mental health
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB46980
local.identifier.citationvolume48
local.identifier.doi10.1071/AH23237
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85184151333
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.publish.csiro.au/
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AH23237.pdf
Size:
633.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format