Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Behavioral ecology of odometric memories in desert ants: acquisition, retention, and integration

dc.contributor.authorCheng, Ken
dc.contributor.authorNarendra, Ajay
dc.contributor.authorWehner, Rudiger
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:21:25Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T08:35:15Z
dc.description.abstractAssuming that the acquisition and retention of memories have costs, properties of memories should fit the functional requirements for the system of memory. Based on a functional analysis of what path integration is meant to do, we predicted that odometric memories in desert ants should show (1) little improvement with repeated training: performance should be as good after one training trial as after six training trials, (2) decay of memory after 24 h, and (3) performance based solely on the most recent outbound trip, with no integration over multiple memories. Desert ants (Cataglyphis fortis) traveled in narrow straight plastic channels to forage for cookie crumbs in a feeder at 6- or 12-m distance. Each ant was tested once by being taken from the feeder and released 2 m from the end of a 32-m channel to run home. The distance at which the ant first turned back (first turn) constituted the data. In acquisition, groups trained one or six times before being tested had unsystematic scatter that did not differ significantly. In retention, ants tested after a 24-h delay showed larger unsystematic scatter than control animals tested after no delay. In integration, ants were trained five times at 6 or 12 m and then tested at 12 or 6 m, respectively. No evidence of integration of multiple odometric memories was found. The results show that the properties of odometric memories are indeed tailored to what the memory system is used for.
dc.identifier.issn1045-2249
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/32131
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.sourceBehavioral Ecology
dc.subjectKeywords: ant; behavioral ecology; memory; Animalia; Cataglyphis fortis; Formicidae Acquisition; Desert ants; Integration; Memory; Odometry; Retention
dc.titleBehavioral ecology of odometric memories in desert ants: acquisition, retention, and integration
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage235
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage227
local.contributor.affiliationCheng, Ken, Macquarie University
local.contributor.affiliationNarendra, Ajay, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationWehner, Rudiger, University of Zurich
local.contributor.authoruidNarendra, Ajay, u4390050
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor060201 - Behavioural Ecology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4133361xPUB89
local.identifier.citationvolume17
local.identifier.doi10.1093/beheco/arj017
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-32144433836
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Cheng_Behavioral_ecology_of_2006.pdf
Size:
114.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format