Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Inter-rater reliability, prevalence and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic research in consultation liaison psychiatry patients

dc.contributor.authorGaleazzi, Gian Maria
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, S
dc.contributor.authorMackinnon, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorRigatelli, M
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:42:12Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T10:33:47Z
dc.description.abstractThe Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) have been proposed by an international group of psychosomatic investigators as an operationalized tool for the assessment of psychological distress in medical patients. The aims of the present study were to evaluate interrater reliability, the distribution of DCPR syndromes, and their relationship with ICD-10 diagnostic categories. One hundred consecutive patients who were referred for psychiatric consultation in a university general hospital consented to assessment for DCPR syndromes as elicited in a joint interview conducted by two researchers. The results showed excellent interrater agreement, with kappa values for the 11 DCPR syndromes ranging from 0.69 to 0.97. More patients met criteria for one or more of the DCPR (87%) than for an ICD-10 diagnosis (75%). Four DCPR syndromes were particularly prevalent: demoralization, alexithymia, illness denial, and type A behavior. DCPR criteria appear to be a useful, reliable, and promising approach in the assessment and description of psychological distress in medical patients. They may serve as a focus of intervention studies in this population.
dc.identifier.issn0033-3182
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/36984
dc.publisherAmerican Psychiatric Publishing Inc
dc.sourcePsychosomatics: the journal of consultation and liaison psychiatry
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; aged; alexithymia; article; consultation; denial; disease classification; distress syndrome; female; human; liaison psychiatry; major clinical study; male; prevalence; psychosomatics; reliability; type A behavior; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Fe
dc.titleInter-rater reliability, prevalence and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic research in consultation liaison psychiatry patients
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage393
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage386
local.contributor.affiliationGaleazzi, Gian Maria, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia (City Univ Mental Health Trust London)
local.contributor.affiliationFerrari, S, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia
local.contributor.affiliationMackinnon, Andrew, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationRigatelli, M, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia
local.contributor.authoruidMackinnon, Andrew, u4231647
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111714 - Mental Health
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4105084xPUB143
local.identifier.citationvolume45
local.identifier.doi10.1176/appi.psy.45.5.386
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-1542434616
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Galeazzi_Inter-rater_reliability,_2004.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format