Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Is intraspecific variation in diet and morphology related to environmental gradients? Exploring Liem's paradox in a cichlid fish

dc.contributor.authorBinning, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorChapman, L J
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:27:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:15:28Z
dc.description.abstractInterspecific studies have demonstrated that trophic morphology and ecology are not always tightly matched: a phenomenon rarely reported at the intraspecific level. In the present study, we explored relationships among diet, morphology and the environment in a widespread cichlid fish, Astatoreochromis alluaudi (Pellegrin 1904), from 6 sites in southern Uganda to test for evidence of eco-morphological matching at the interdemic level. Previous studies of Astatoreochromis alluaudi have demonstrated developmental plasticity in trophic morphology in response to diet: a mollusk diet produces specimens with large pharyngeal jaws and muscles, whereas a soft-food diet produces smaller pharyngeal jaws and corresponding changes in musculature. Sites were chosen to maximize variability in environmental variables that might directly or indirectly affect trophic morphology. We found significant differences in pharyngeal jaw and muscle morphology among populations. Similarly, we found differences in diets among sites: mollusks were found in the stomachs of fish from only 2 populations sampled, despite the presence of mollusks in 5 of the 6 sites. Although trophic morphology did match the observed diet in 2 sites, diet did not correlate with either morphology or environmental variables across sites, nor were environmental variables correlated with morphological variation among sites. These results suggest that mismatch can occur among different populations of a single species for reasons such as seasonality in resources, developmental plasticity and/or complex indirect interactions. Intraspecific mechanisms should be further studied in order to better understand the complex relationships between morphological specialization and ecological generalization.
dc.identifier.issn1749-4877
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/68034
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.sourceIntegrative Zoology Online
dc.subjectKeywords: adaptation; animal; animal disease; article; cichlid; classification; diet; ecosystem; feeding behavior; physiology; species difference; Adaptation, Physiological; Animals; Cichlids; Diet; Ecosystem; Feeding Behavior; Species Specificity; Astatoreochromis Ecological specialization; Fish diet; Liem's paradox; Population divergence; Trophic morphology
dc.titleIs intraspecific variation in diet and morphology related to environmental gradients? Exploring Liem's paradox in a cichlid fish
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage255
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage241
local.contributor.affiliationBinning, Sandra, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationChapman, L J, McGill University
local.contributor.authoruidBinning, Sandra, u4762744
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor060399 - Evolutionary Biology not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB1597
local.identifier.citationvolume5
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00209.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-78651286711
local.identifier.thomsonID000281554900006
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Binning_Is_intraspecific_variation_in_2010.pdf
Size:
979.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format