Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Designing electoral institutions: STV systems and their consequences

dc.contributor.authorFarrell, David M.en
dc.contributor.authorMackerras, Malcolmen
dc.contributor.authorMcAllister, Ianen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T19:29:49Z
dc.date.available2025-05-30T19:29:49Z
dc.date.issued1996en
dc.description.abstractAlthough championed by advocates of proportional representation, the single transferable vote form of PR has been used consistently in only a small number of countries - principally Australia, Ireland and Malta. This paper examines the origins and development of STV and its implications for the political systems that use it. The results show that STV varies so widely in its form and application, differing on no less than five major characteristics, that it is impossible to identify any single generic type. These differences are also reflected in the party strategies that are used to maximize the vote under STV. A regression analysis of the various types of STV shows that Malta is the most proportional system, followed by Ireland and Tasmania. Ireland has the largest party system among the countries that use STV, net of other factors.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent20en
dc.identifier.issn0032-3217en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-8448-6738/work/166420452en
dc.identifier.scopus0030094172en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030094172&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733755322
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourcePolitical Studiesen
dc.titleDesigning electoral institutions: STV systems and their consequencesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage43en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage24en
local.contributor.affiliationFarrell, David M.; University of Manchesteren
local.contributor.affiliationMackerras, Malcolm; University of New South Walesen
local.contributor.affiliationMcAllister, Ian; University of New South Walesen
local.identifier.citationvolume44en
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00755.xen
local.identifier.purefc899cc3-4064-4a01-ad32-d1f737d98f59en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0030094172en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads