Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Using crowd-sourced allergic rhinitis symptom data to improve grass pollen forecasts and predict individual symptoms

dc.contributor.authorSilver, Jeremy D.
dc.contributor.authorSpriggs, Kymble
dc.contributor.authorHaberle, Simon
dc.contributor.authorKatelaris, Constance
dc.contributor.authorNewbigin, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorLampugnani, Edwin
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T22:49:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2022-07-31T08:16:43Z
dc.description.abstractSeasonal allergic rhinitis (AR), also known as hay fever, is a common respiratory condition brought on by a range of environmental triggers. Previous work has characterised the relationships between community-level AR symptoms collected using mobile apps in two Australian cities, Canberra and Melbourne, and various environmental covariates including pollen. Here, we build on these relationships by assessing the skill of models that provide a next-day forecast of an individual's risk of developing AR and that nowcast ambient grass pollen concentrations using crowd-sourced AR symptoms as a predictor. Categorical grass pollen forecasts (low/moderate/high) were made based on binning mean daily symptom scores by corresponding categories. Models for an individual's risk were constructed by forward variable selection, considering environmental, demographic, behaviour and health-related inputs, with non-linear responses permitted. Proportional-odds logistic regression was then applied with the variables selected, modelling the symptom scores on their original five-point scale. AR symptom-based estimates of today's average grass pollen concentration were more accurate than those provided by two benchmark forecasting methods using various metrics for assessing accuracy. Predictions of an individual's next-day AR symptoms rated on a five-point scale were correct in 36% of cases and within one point on this scale in 82% of cases. Both outcomes were significantly better than chance. This large-scale AR symptoms measurement program shows that crowd-sourced symptom scores can be used to predict the daily average grass pollen concentration, as well as provide a personalised AR forecast.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for the Melbourne Pollen Monitoring Program and for analysis was provided by the University of Melbourne. Funding for the Canberra Pollen Monitoring Program was provided by the Australian National University and ACT Health. We thank Pamela Burton (Campbelltown Hospital and Western Sydney University) for her assistance with obtaining ethics approval and colleagues in the AusPollen network (NHMRC grant GNT1116107) for ongoing discussions.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/298248
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1116107en_AU
dc.rights© 2020 The authorsen_AU
dc.sourceScience of the Total Environmenten_AU
dc.subjectPollenen_AU
dc.subjectModellingen_AU
dc.subjectAllergic rhinitisen_AU
dc.subjectSymptom scoreen_AU
dc.subjectCitizen scienceen_AU
dc.titleUsing crowd-sourced allergic rhinitis symptom data to improve grass pollen forecasts and predict individual symptomsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage11en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSilver, Jeremy D., University of Melbourneen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSpriggs, Kymble, University of Melbourneen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHaberle, Simon, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKatelaris, Constance, University of Western Sydneyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNewbigin, Edward J., The University of Melbourneen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLampugnani, Edwin, The University of Melbourneen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidHaberle, Simon, u3399096en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor420600 - Public healthen_AU
local.identifier.absseo200599 - Specific population health (excl. Indigenous health) not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB11081en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume720en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137351en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85080984294
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000525736600154
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0048969720308615-main.pdf
Size:
730.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: