A review of conceptual approaches and empirical evidence on probability and nonprobability sample survey research
Loading...
Date
Authors
Cornesse, Carina
Blom, Annelies G.
Dutwin, David
Krosnick, Jon A.
De Leeuw, Edith D.
Legleye, Stephane
Pasek, Josh
Pennay, Darren
Phillips, Ben
Sakshaug, Joseph W.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate in the survey research literature about whether and when probability and nonprobability sample surveys produce accurate estimates of a larger population. Statistical theory provides a justification for confidence in probability sampling as a function of the survey design, whereas inferences based on nonprobability sampling are entirely dependent on models for validity. This article reviews the current debate about probability and nonprobability sample surveys. We describe the conditions under which nonprobability sample surveys may provide accurate results in theory and discuss empirical evidence on which types of samples produce the highest accuracy in practice. From these theoretical and empirical considerations, we derive best-practice recommendations and outline paths for future research
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description